Edited by Greg Neyman
Argument:
In order to fit all the animals on the ark, some young earth creationists propose that the animals were juveniles
Source: Woodmorappe, John, 1996. Noah's Ark: A Feasibility Study, ICR, Santee, CA, p. 13
Response:
Juvenile animals would have increased needs, stretching Noah and his family even further in caring for them (i.e. a baby is harder to care for than an adult)
Even with juvenile animals, the ark is still overcrowded
Noah was instructed to take "the male and its mate". This implies sexual maturity, not juveniles
With the old earth creationism model for a local flood, Noah would only have to take animals which mankind depended on, and lived in the local area of the flood. The ark could have contained this smaller number of animals
For more Reading:
If you are not a Christian, and you have been holding out on making a decision for Christ because the Church always preached a message that was contrary to what you saw in the scientific world, then rest assured that the Bible is the inerrant Word of God, and you can believe in Christ and receive salvation, while still believing in an old earth. Click here for more.
Are you a Christian who believes in young earth creationism? Now that we have shown the many difficulties of the young earth creation science model in this and many other articles, how does this impact your Christian life? If you are a young earth creationism believer, click here.
Young Earth Creation Science Argument Index
Related Articles
To learn more
about old earth creationism, see
Old Earth Belief,
or check out the article
Can You Be A
Christian and Believe in an Old Earth?
Feel free to check out more of this website. Our goal is to
provide rebuttals to the bad science behind young earth creationism,
and honor God by properly presenting His creation.