Creation Science

Evolution and Creation Science

ICR Claim: The Fossils Say No, Cretaceous Dinosaurs 

 

By Greg Neyman

© Old Earth Ministries

First Published 15 September 2021

     The Institute of Creation Research recently published an article titled “The Fossils Still Say No: Capping a Cretaceous Conundrum.” The article claims that many dinosaur species of the Cretaceous appeared suddenly, with no apparent prior fossil species that could have evolved into the new species.

     The first such species mentioned is Tyrannosaurus rex…although oddly, ICR does not claim in the two paragraphs on this species that it appeared suddenly...he merely gives a brief description of T. rex.  It correctly notes that T. rex was part of a group of dinosaurs known as tyrannosaurids. There is actually a long list of tyrannosaurids that shows its possible evolutionary tree.1

Tyrannosaurus family tree

     The article suddenly jumps to the claim "Another popular dinosaur of the Cretaceous that appears suddenly with no evolutionary ancestors is the Triceratops." Note that the author did not directly claim T-rex appeared suddenly, but he implies it in this sentence about triceratops. The author proceeds to give a brief description of Triceratops. Triceratops belongs to the family Ceratopsoidea, which has numerous species, and here is its family tree:2

Ceratopsoidea family tree

 

 

    This tree does not show the species leading up to the Ceratopsids. The cladogram below shows one understanding of the relationship between ceratopsids and its precursors.3

Cladogram Neornithischia

     The final claim is about the hadrosaurs.  The author gives a description of hadrosaurids, but makes no direct claims about its evolution.  The cladogram below shows the current understanding of hadrosaurid's tree.4

hadrosauridae cladogram

     By now, you may have noticed a pattern...the author gives a brief description of each species. These descriptions are meant to imply the author is a subject matter expert on these dinosaurs, so that the reader will trust the claims of he is making in the article. This is typical of creation science writers. They are writing for a specific audience...an audience that already believes in a young earth. The article is kept at a simple level for the reader, and is meant to awe them with facts about God's creations.

     The author continues to dazzle his readers, with claims about mammal and birds appearing suddenly in the fossil record with no supposed evolutionary precursors, and finally mentions the Cretaceous extinction event. Although having nothing to do with dinosaur evolution, this is a tie-in to the young earth global flood model, which he uses to conclude the article. Since this is a separate issue that has been addressed elsewhere, there is no need to mention it here. 

 

Conclusion

 

     Despite the claims of young earth creationists that no evolution is apparent for these species, scientists have postulated their possible family trees, based on morphological similarites between the species that indicates a relationship between the species. It should be noted that the study of a species evolutionary roots is dependent upon the fossil record, which is not a complete record of past life. Only a very small percentage of dinosaurs are preserved as fossils, so we may never reach a full understanding of their evolution.

     As a side note...when a transitional species is found in the fossil record, YEC's dismiss it outright. Imagine two dinosaur species, found at 100 and 110 million years ago respectively. Scientists then discover a new species at 105 million years ago, with features of both. YEC's won't recognize the transitional fossil...they merely claim, "Where is this new fossil's transitional forms." It's a never-ending, no-win scenario when dealing with their logic (or lack thereof). 

     It should also be noted that for progressive creationists, the claims by young earth creationists that species appeared suddenly fits perfectly with their beliefs. God, throughout his period of creating species over millions of years, created each species as a unique creation. The only dispute between YEC's and progressive creationists, such as Dr. Hugh Ross of Reasons to Believe, is the length of creation. 

 -------------------------------------------

1 https://www.si.edu/newsdesk/photos/dinosaur-discovery-family-tree

2 https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Synthetic-phylogenetic-tree-with-all-ceratopsoid-species-See-Appendix-S1-and-Tables-S4_fig7_281707641

3  Clint. A Boy (2015). "The systematic relationships and biogeographic history of ornithischian dinosaurs". PeerJ. (e1523).

4 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadrosauridae


 

     If you are not a Christian, and you have been holding out on making a decision for Christ because the Church always preached a message that was contrary to what you saw in the scientific world, then rest assured that the Bible is the inerrant Word of God, and you can believe in Christ and receive salvation, while still believing in an old earth.  Click here for more.

 

    Are you a Christian who believes in young earth creationism?  Now that we have shown the many difficulties of the young earth creation science model in this and many other articles, how does this impact your Christian life?  If you are a young earth creationism believer, click here.


 

 Share This Page
 
 

Related Articles

Evolution Articles

Death Before Sin Articles

 

To learn more about old earth creationism, see Old Earth Belief, or check out the article Can You Be A Christian and Believe in an Old Earth?  

 Feel free to check out more of this website.  Our goal is to provide rebuttals to the bad science behind young earth creationism, and honor God by properly presenting His creation.