Creation Science

Creation Science Rebuttals -

Evolutionary Dinosaur DNA Nonsense

 

Review by Greg Neyman

First Published 2009

 

    In an article on the Creation, Dinosaurs and the Flood website, young earth creation science advocate Charlie Liebert contends that the match between DNA from a Triceratops and a turkey's DNA is not evidence of evolution.1

     In 2000, it was announced that a small DNA sequence was recovered from a poorly mineralized bone of a triceratops.  When it was analyzed, the 130 base pairs were a 100% match to those of turkey.  While this does strengthen the argument that birds evolved from dinosaurs, it does not directly prove evolution.  This is because the triceratops is a ceratopsid, and birds supposedly evolved from theropods.

     The only objection that Liebert uses is that "many experts believe nucleic acid is unlikely to survive more than 100,000 years."  This claim is widespread, but it is not supported by observational evidence.  DNA is thought to break down rapidly, based on short term studies of unfossilized specimens.  However, DNA that is protected by the substance in which it is fossilized can survive a long time.2  For example, scientists have revived bacteria that was trapped in salt deposits, which provided protection from the environment.  The bacteria were from deposits that were 250 million years old!  Another paper from the 1960's claimed to have done the same thing to 500 million year old bacteria.   Other examples include 25 million year old termite DNA, 120 million year old fossil weevil, bacteria in amber that is 40 million years old, and of course, the soft tissue from the dinosaurs T-rex and the newly announced hadrosaur.

     The scientific community has long known that under the right conditions, DNA can survive a long time.   Thanks to the dinosaur soft-tissue discoveries, this information is becoming public knowledge.  Of course, young earth creationists will never recognize this information, and will continue to falsely claim that the DNA indicates that the earth is young.

     Note that Liebert is not questioning the DNA match.  He only casts doubt upon the survivability of DNA over millions of years.  Thus, he does not dispute the claim that the DNA matches. 

 

1  Evolutionary Dinosaur DNA Nonsense, published on the web at sixdaycreation.com/facts/dinosaurs/july2000.html

2  Molecular History Research Center website; and sciencenews.org/pages/pdfs/data/1999/15524/15524-07.pdf 

 

Visit Old Earth Ministries on Facebook.

 


 

     If you are not a Christian, and you have been holding out on making a decision for Christ because the Church always preached a message that was contrary to what you saw in the scientific world, then rest assured that the Bible is the inerrant Word of God, and you can believe in Christ and receive salvation, while still believing in an old earth.  Click here for more.

 

    Are you a Christian who believes in young earth creationism?  Now that we have shown the many difficulties of the young earth creation science model in this and many other articles, how does this impact your Christian life?  If you are a young earth creationism believer, click here.

 

 

Creation, Dinosaurs and the Flood Review Homepage

 

Visit Old Earth Ministries on Facebook.

 

To learn more about old earth creationism, see Old Earth Belief, or check out the article Can You Be A Christian and Believe in an Old Earth?  

 Feel free to check out more of this website.  Our goal is to provide rebuttals to the bad science behind young earth creationism, and honor God by properly presenting His creation.